Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

MacBookPro16,2

465 GB · macOS

Sample count: 5

Change Model

Model B

samsung SM-F741W

512 GB · Android

Sample count: 3

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A MacBookPro16,2 · 465 GB2,422.44
B samsung SM-F741W · 512 GB2,423.45

B is 0.04% higher than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A MacBookPro16,2 · 465 GB1,642.34
B samsung SM-F741W · 512 GB1,520.02

B is 7.45% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A MacBookPro16,2 · 465 GB38.04
B samsung SM-F741W · 512 GB86.82

B is 128.24% higher than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A MacBookPro16,2 · 465 GB212.30
B samsung SM-F741W · 512 GB100.22

B is 52.79% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · MacBookPro16,2 · 465 GBB · samsung SM-F741W · 512 GB
PlatformmacOSAndroid
Sample count53
Latest measurement2025-02-052025-07-27
Random read IOPS9,73822,227
Random write IOPS54,35025,657
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results