Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N

238 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Model B

SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB2,942.53
B SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB2,939.05

B is 0.12% lower than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB1,338.56
B SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB1,293.45

B is 3.37% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB43.32
B SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB56.19

B is 29.73% higher than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB113.37
B SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB142.58

B is 25.76% higher than A

Configuration details

DetailA · SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GBB · SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count12
Latest measurement2023-07-252023-09-14
Random read IOPS11,08914,386
Random write IOPS29,02436,501
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results