Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe

238 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Model B

SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 3

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB1,058.95
B SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB1,095.98

B is 3.50% higher than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB857.62
B SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB615.73

B is 28.21% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB25.28
B SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB20.84

B is 17.55% lower than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB34.48
B SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB38.65

B is 12.09% higher than A

Configuration details

DetailA · NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GBB · SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count13
Latest measurement2023-05-082022-12-07
Random read IOPS6,4715,335
Random write IOPS8,8289,895
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results