Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4

953 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Model B

Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 11

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB4,511.01
B Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB4,536.75

B is 0.57% higher than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB2,876.40
B Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB3,146.40

B is 9.39% higher than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB60.55
B Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB62.38

B is 3.02% higher than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB154.03
B Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB177.21

B is 15.05% higher than A

Configuration details

DetailA · ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GBB · Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count111
Latest measurement2023-05-082023-10-21
Random read IOPS15,50015,969
Random write IOPS39,43245,365
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results