Side by side
Compare storage performance
Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.
Select a benchmark configuration
Choose Model B
Each option includes its storage capacity. Select one to add it to your comparison.
Models with the most samples
Your comparison
Storage performance
Sequential read
MiB/s · higher is fasterSame measured average
Sequential write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 14.13% higher than A
4 KiB random read
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 2.04% lower than A
4 KiB random write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 7.63% higher than A
Configuration details
| Detail | A · Mac16,1 · 460 GB | B · Mac14,12 · 460 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | macOS | macOS |
| Sample count | 7 | 5 |
| Latest measurement | 2026-06-16 | 2024-01-02 |
| Random read IOPS | 12,499 | 12,243 |
| Random write IOPS | 9,365 | 10,079 |
| All capacities | View Model → | View Model → |
Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements
Four tests. A clearer comparison.
Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.