Side by side
Compare storage performance
Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.
Select a benchmark configuration
Choose Model B
Each option includes its storage capacity. Select one to add it to your comparison.
Models with the most samples
Your comparison
Storage performance
Sequential read
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 0.30% higher than A
Sequential write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 131.52% higher than A
4 KiB random read
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 60.74% lower than A
4 KiB random write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 30.87% lower than A
Configuration details
| Detail | A · KINGSTON SA2000M8500G · 465 GB | B · CT1000P3SSD8 · 931 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | Windows | Windows |
| Sample count | 3 | 8 |
| Latest measurement | 2023-10-10 | 2023-10-22 |
| Random read IOPS | 38,247 | 15,018 |
| Random write IOPS | 22,131 | 15,300 |
| All capacities | View Model → | View Model → |
Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements
Four tests. A clearer comparison.
Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.