Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Model B

BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB2,746.57
B BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB2,745.49

B is 0.04% lower than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB2,045.85
B BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB2,986.67

B is 45.99% higher than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB133.63
B BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB36.22

B is 72.90% lower than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB120.76
B BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB76.26

B is 36.85% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GBB · BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count22
Latest measurement2023-11-122023-11-17
Random read IOPS34,2099,271
Random write IOPS30,91519,523
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results