Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

NEO-J5-SSD-256GB

238 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Model B

Xiaomi 2201117SG

128 GB · Android

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NEO-J5-SSD-256GB · 238 GB515.09
B Xiaomi 2201117SG · 128 GB515.09

Same measured average

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NEO-J5-SSD-256GB · 238 GB485.22
B Xiaomi 2201117SG · 128 GB365.98

B is 24.57% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NEO-J5-SSD-256GB · 238 GB39.31
B Xiaomi 2201117SG · 128 GB32.27

B is 17.91% lower than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A NEO-J5-SSD-256GB · 238 GB37.96
B Xiaomi 2201117SG · 128 GB34.88

B is 8.11% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · NEO-J5-SSD-256GB · 238 GBB · Xiaomi 2201117SG · 128 GB
PlatformWindowsAndroid
Sample count21
Latest measurement2023-11-082026-05-13
Random read IOPS10,0648,262
Random write IOPS9,7178,929
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results