Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

KINGSTON SA400S37240G ATA Device

223 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Model B

samsung SM-A127F

64 GB · Android

Sample count: 4

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON SA400S37240G ATA Device · 223 GB225.40
B samsung SM-A127F · 64 GB225.35

B is 0.02% lower than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON SA400S37240G ATA Device · 223 GB208.38
B samsung SM-A127F · 64 GB83.21

B is 60.07% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON SA400S37240G ATA Device · 223 GB22.87
B samsung SM-A127F · 64 GB11.81

B is 48.38% lower than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A KINGSTON SA400S37240G ATA Device · 223 GB32.56
B samsung SM-A127F · 64 GB6.82

B is 79.06% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · KINGSTON SA400S37240G ATA Device · 223 GBB · samsung SM-A127F · 64 GB
PlatformWindowsAndroid
Sample count14
Latest measurement2023-01-172024-07-30
Random read IOPS5,8553,022
Random write IOPS8,3361,745
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results