Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0

931 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Model B

NVMe Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 7

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 · 931 GB3,200.00
B NVMe Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM · 476 GB3,171.12

B is 0.90% lower than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 · 931 GB4,612.61
B NVMe Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM · 476 GB1,475.67

B is 68.01% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 · 931 GB48.85
B NVMe Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM · 476 GB51.18

B is 4.75% higher than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 · 931 GB197.23
B NVMe Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM · 476 GB168.69

B is 14.47% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 · 931 GBB · NVMe Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM · 476 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count17
Latest measurement2022-12-232026-07-06
Random read IOPS12,50713,101
Random write IOPS50,49043,185
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results