Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 3

Change Model

Model B

NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe

238 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB1,095.98
B NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB1,058.95

B is 3.38% lower than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB615.73
B NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB857.62

B is 39.29% higher than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB20.84
B NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB25.28

B is 21.28% higher than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GB38.65
B NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB34.48

B is 10.78% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A · 476 GBB · NVMe Micron 2200 NVMe · 238 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count31
Latest measurement2022-12-072023-05-08
Random read IOPS5,3356,471
Random write IOPS9,8958,828
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results