Side by side
Compare storage performance
Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.
Select a benchmark configuration
Choose Model B
Each option includes its storage capacity. Select one to add it to your comparison.
Models with the most samples
Your comparison
Storage performance
Sequential read
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 0.10% higher than A
Sequential write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 15.33% lower than A
4 KiB random read
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 2.21% higher than A
4 KiB random write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 14.95% higher than A
Configuration details
| Detail | A · Mac14,14 · 7449 GB | B · Mac14,6 · 3721 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | macOS | macOS |
| Sample count | 1 | 6 |
| Latest measurement | 2024-05-22 | 2024-06-11 |
| Random read IOPS | 9,741 | 9,956 |
| Random write IOPS | 7,728 | 8,884 |
| All capacities | View Model → | View Model → |
Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements
Four tests. A clearer comparison.
Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.