Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Model B

KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB2,745.49
B KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB2,746.57

B is 0.04% higher than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB2,986.67
B KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB2,045.85

B is 31.50% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB36.22
B KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB133.63

B is 268.99% higher than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GB76.26
B KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB120.76

B is 58.35% higher than A

Configuration details

DetailA · BC901 NVMe SK hynix 512GB · 476 GBB · KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AI1 · 476 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count22
Latest measurement2023-11-172023-11-12
Random read IOPS9,27134,209
Random write IOPS19,52330,915
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results