Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 11

Change Model

Model B

ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4

953 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB4,536.75
B ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB4,511.01

B is 0.57% lower than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB3,146.40
B ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB2,876.40

B is 8.58% lower than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB62.38
B ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB60.55

B is 2.93% lower than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GB177.21
B ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB154.03

B is 13.08% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · Lexar SSD NM7A1 512GB · 476 GBB · ESR01TBMFCT-E8GBTOEM4 · 953 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count111
Latest measurement2023-10-212023-05-08
Random read IOPS15,96915,500
Random write IOPS45,36539,432
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results