Side by side
Compare storage performance
Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.
Select a benchmark configuration
Choose Model B
Each option includes its storage capacity. Select one to add it to your comparison.
Models with the most samples
Your comparison
Storage performance
Sequential read
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 0.56% higher than A
Sequential write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 19.11% higher than A
4 KiB random read
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 64.17% higher than A
4 KiB random write
MiB/s · higher is fasterB is 344.50% higher than A
Configuration details
| Detail | A · Mac14,13 · 3721 GB | B · CT2000P5PSSD8 · 1863 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | macOS | Windows |
| Sample count | 1 | 1 |
| Latest measurement | 2024-05-17 | 2023-10-18 |
| Random read IOPS | 10,117 | 16,608 |
| Random write IOPS | 8,818 | 39,196 |
| All capacities | View Model → | View Model → |
Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements
Four tests. A clearer comparison.
Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.