Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Model B

SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N

238 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB2,939.05
B SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB2,942.53

B is 0.12% higher than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB1,293.45
B SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB1,338.56

B is 3.49% higher than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB56.19
B SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB43.32

B is 22.92% lower than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GB142.58
B SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB113.37

B is 20.48% lower than A

Configuration details

DetailA · SAMSUNG MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 · 476 GBB · SKHynix_HFS256GDE9X081N · 238 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count21
Latest measurement2023-09-142023-07-25
Random read IOPS14,38611,089
Random write IOPS36,50129,024
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results