Side by side

Compare storage performance

Choose two Models, then select Compare. You can compare different storage capacities.

Model A

WDC WD10EZEX-75WN4A0

931 GB · Windows

Sample count: 1

Change Model

Model B

KODAK SS D X200 512GB USB Device

476 GB · Windows

Sample count: 2

Change Model

Both Models are ready.

Your comparison

Storage performance

Swap A & B

Sequential read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDC WD10EZEX-75WN4A0 · 931 GB154.08
B KODAK SS D X200 512GB USB Device · 476 GB194.17

B is 26.02% higher than A

Sequential write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDC WD10EZEX-75WN4A0 · 931 GB161.59
B KODAK SS D X200 512GB USB Device · 476 GB188.88

B is 16.89% higher than A

4 KiB random read

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDC WD10EZEX-75WN4A0 · 931 GB0.61
B KODAK SS D X200 512GB USB Device · 476 GB9.66

B is 1,478.39% higher than A

4 KiB random write

MiB/s · higher is faster
A WDC WD10EZEX-75WN4A0 · 931 GB1.45
B KODAK SS D X200 512GB USB Device · 476 GB18.63

B is 1,182.68% higher than A

Configuration details

DetailA · WDC WD10EZEX-75WN4A0 · 931 GBB · KODAK SS D X200 512GB USB Device · 476 GB
PlatformWindowsWindows
Sample count12
Latest measurement2023-07-182023-08-21
Random read IOPS1572,474
Random write IOPS3724,768
All capacitiesView Model →View Model →

Results checked · Speeds in MiB/s · About these measurements

Four tests. A clearer comparison.

Compare sequential and 4 KiB random read/write speeds side by side. Every option includes its Model, capacity and platform. You can compare 512 GB with 256 GB, including two capacities of the same Model.

How the tests work · Browse all results